In a recent post I accidentally left the name of my correspondent attached to the question that was posed. For this I offer an unreserved apology. It is my practice to always maintain the confidence of my correspondent’s identity. Of course I cannot help it if people ‘in the know’ can infer who a correspondent is but it is my practice to always remove, and keep confidential, identifying information. On this occasion that did not happen.
The post has been deleted and to that person again I offer my apology. To future correspondents I confirm that it is my intention to continue to keep confidential the names of people who write to me.
Australian Emergency Law 
G’day Professor,
Mate, it takes a huge man to concede error. I always enjoy your updates. This, whilst not in the slightest way beneficial to my practice and understanding of policy and legislation, is the most pleasing update. It shows that we all make errors, and further still, that they are addressable.
I do hope that the person you reference is not impacted, but I am comforted by you efforts to repent.
Keep up the good the work! Never stop. Never.
Cheers, Devo.
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 22:57, Australian Emergency Law wrote:
> M. Eburn posted: “In a recent post I accidentally left the name of my > correspondent attached to the question that was posed. For this I offer an > unreserved apology. It is my practice to always maintain the confidence of > my correspondent’s identity. Of course I cannot help ” >